How Kinston Can Honestly End Property Taxes—and Thrive

Property taxes have long been a cornerstone of local government funding in the United States. In Kinston, as in most cities, homeowners pay annual taxes on their property, which fund schools, police, fire departments, and other essential services. But what if there was a better way—one that didn’t feel like “renting” land you already own from the state?

The Case Against Property Taxes

For many residents, property taxes are a source of frustration. Even after paying off a mortgage, homeowners must continue to pay the government to keep their property. In North Carolina, the average property tax rate is about 0.77% of a home’s value. For a $150,000 home in Kinston, that’s roughly $1,155 per year—money that could go toward savings, investments, or local spending.

Are There Alternatives?

Yes! Some cities and states have experimented with alternative revenue models. For example:

• Alaska: Several municipalities in Alaska do not levy property taxes at all. Instead, they rely on sales taxes, state oil revenues, and fees for services.

• Texas: While Texas has property taxes, it does not have a state income tax, showing that major revenue sources can be shifted.

  \New Hampshire: Relies heavily on property taxes but has no state sales or income tax, demonstrating that different mixes are possible.

• 
  

Cities can also generate revenue through:

• Local sales taxes

• Service fees (utilities, permits, etc.)

• Business taxes

  
  

  How Could Kinston Transition?

Ending property taxes would require a careful, phased approach:

1. Community Engagement: Residents and leaders must discuss priorities and alternatives.

2. Pilot Programs: Test new revenue sources, such as modest local sales taxes or service fees.

3. Efficiency Audits: Review city spending to identify savings and reduce costs.

4. State Support: Seek grants or state funding for essential services during the transition.

   
   

Potential Benefits

• Homeowners gain true ownership and security.

• Increased local investment and pride.

• Attraction of new residents and businesses.

• More transparent and accountable city budgeting.

  
  

Challenges to Consider

• Funding schools and emergency services without property taxes.

• Ensuring fairness so all residents contribute appropriately.

• Managing the transition without service disruptions.

  
  

Conclusion

Kinston can lead the way in rethinking how cities fund themselves. By exploring alternatives to property taxes, we can empower homeowners, strengthen our community, and build a more just and sustainable future. It’s time to start the conversation—one person, one project at a time.